Ratings… you know those little stars that can embolden you or crush you depending on their presence or absence? They are a necessary evil in this, and just about any consumer driven business. They tell people what to buy and what not to buy. They tell people how good your work is. They tell people your worth… oh wait, let’s not get carried away.
Ratings are a quantifiable way to define how a consumer feels about a particular product. Even for me, a voracious consumer of stories good and bad, the star rating can help guide
What qualifies someone to rate a product? Simple… they have to be a consumer of said product. Do they have to be the “right” consumer? No. Do they have to have special qualifications? No. Do they have to be an avid consumer? Nope. Do they need to be a fellow producer of said product? Not even remotely. Do they have to have actually read/used the work in question? Well theoretically, yes… but in actuality no, they don’t.
As a reviewer, I deal with numbers every day. Luckily, higher math isn’t required… just the ability to count to 5 and to know simple comparisons.
Here is the basic outline of the rating system used here on Prism Book Alliance:
1 – Unreadable
2 – Okay, but has some fundamental flaws
3 – Liked it but nothing stood out
4 – Loved it
5 – Outstanding
Notice there is no “Perfect” rating. Even 5-star falls far short of perfect. For me personally, 5-star is a book so special that any flaws or errors I encounter just cease to matter. These are the books that leave me with a Book Hangover.
Everyone has their own rating scale. Some people give 5-star easily. For some 3-star is the best for which you can hope.
Books talk to me. They tell me what their rating should be. Often this happens in the first chapter or two. Then it is up to the work to prove me right or wrong. It has been done in both directions. I recently had a book that was heading into 2-star territory that snuck up on me and connected with me on a level I still can’t explain. It’s rating ended up higher. Others that have started out promising have fizzled and died before the end. I will tell you the books that don’t grab me from the beginning will get lower ratings. Problems, mistakes, plot holes, and the like will get more attention and notice as I read.
There was a time when I was much freer with 5-stars than I am now. Maybe it is because I have gotten jaded, but I prefer to think that I have gotten more discerning with my old age. I rarely, if ever, fangirl in my ratings. Those authors who get consistently high marks from me get those because I love something about their writing. Something connects with me.
I have also learned over the years that there are aspects in writing other people love, can’t get enough of, or can just plain overlook. Some of those aspects annoy me or are things I just can’t get past. I am a detail oriented person. Typos and grammar mistakes stick out to me… if the author isn’t able to make me not care.
If I can’t get into the story enough to ignore these mistakes, there is a problem with the story. If a reviewer starts “harping” on editing and proofreading, we aren’t being nit-picky. It should be taken as a sign of one of two things:
1) The story isn’t engaging the reader enough.
2) The editing or proofreading is so dreadful that the reviewer can’t see through the mistakes to get TO the story.
If I, as a reviewer, can’t get to your story, I am going to start pointing out technical issues. Those issues will then translate into a number. Then there are those stories that fall into both camps. Terrible technically, but engage me somehow. Those are the ones I have a hard time putting a number on.
I think in numbers. When I think about a book I think about the rating I gave it first. But I am an engineer by trade. I am a numbers person. Some people look at the words first. At the review itself. That is why we have both.
There is a debate in the publishing industry (and probably every other consumer driven industry out there) about the “Rating scale” and whether it is right or wrong to assign numbers and what numbers should be assigned. It comes down to this: some people are numbers people, some people are words people, and some people like both.
Is the 5-star rating system the best way? Maybe. Maybe not. Is it what is used widely in the consumer industry and therefore the standard? Yes. Am I looking to change that? Nope.
Here on Prism we allow for half and quarter stars. That effectively turns a 5 point rating system to a 10 or 20 point system. The quarter point ratings are rare, but sometimes you just can’t give that last little nudge up or down. We don’t give 4.75 because we just “had to find something wrong” with a particular work. We give 4.75 because it was awesome but just not quite spectacular enough to nudge it that last .25. We don’t give 4.25 because we want one author or work to be seen as superior over another, there is just something special enough about it that we can’t reconcile giving it a 4. Of course, when we cross post onto GR or Amazon, we have to round up or down. Hate it or love it, those are the parameters within which we operate.
I am often asked why I gave Rating A or Rating B to a particular book and what said author could have done to get a higher rating. First of all, that author probably hasn’t read my review because I usually make it pretty obvious in the review. However, sometimes the difference between a 4 and a 5 is just a feeling. It is intangible. If you want to know why a 4.75 instead of a 5? Forget it. I probably can’t explain it.
I have a number of paperbacks, most of which are signed, to giveaway. Over the between now (11 Mar 2017) and 31 Mar 2017, every comment on the blog (this post and all other new posts), will be entered to win 1 of these paperbacks. There are also some misc swag items, so there will be a few packs of these to give away as well.
Thank you so much for your support over the last 4 years. Prism will be closing its doors on 1 April 2017. All content will remain available, but no new content will appear after 31 Mar 2017. As such all request forms have been turned off. Again Thank you,
|This post may contain affiliate links.
|Prism Book Alliance® assumes no liability for the ownership of photos or content used in guest posts and interviews. The post author assumes all responsibility and liability for this content.|